Eastbourne Borough Council has commenced preparation of a new Local Plan for Eastbourne, which will cover the period from 2018 to 2038. The Eastbourne Local Plan will be the key planning document that will plan and manage growth, regeneration and development across the Borough over the next 20 years.
In order to obtain views on how Eastbourne should change in the future, EBC has published a consultative report – Eastbourne’s Direction of Travel: Issues & Options for the Eastbourne Local Plan – which identifies the key issues and opportunities that the Local Plan should address.
Residents, businesses and other stakeholders are invited to respond to all or any of the 42 questions and 30 options identified in the ‘Issues & Options’ document. The responses to this consultation will inform the production of the Local Plan.
The most relevant of the questions for Sovereign Harbour residents are the two relating to possible change of use for land on Sites 6 and 7a beside Pevensey Bay Road that would allow it to be used for light industry businesses. They are:
Question 14: Sovereign Harbour Site 6
• Would Sovereign Harbour Site 6 be an appropriate and attractive
location for light industrial development?
Question 15: Sovereign Harbour Site 7a
• What employment-generating uses would be appropriate for Sovereign Harbour Site 7a?
When considering these questions (and all the others) please refer to the additional points and information contained in the Issues & Options document. If you feel strongly about any issues in the EBC Plan make sure you let EBC know.
BackgroundIn the 2013 Sovereign Harbour Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) both sites were identified as space for employment use.
At that time it was considered that Site 6 should provide employment through office space development, and the flat area of this site was jointly acquired by Eastbourne Borough Council and East Sussex County Council on a 999 year lease to develop a business park. Pacific House is the result of the first phase of that. Two similar office blocks on the site were planned that would have filled the space between Pacific House and the Community Centre.
In 2013, Site 7 as a whole was considered suitable for a mix of uses including employment, residential and public open space. Since then, the Harbour Medical Practice has been built in a corner of Site 7a. (Site 7b is reserved for the public open space with plans for it currently being drawn up which will be submitted for approval soon. On Site 7c, the first phase of residential housing (Macaulay Place) has been completed, and further building is in hand to provide a final total of 70 homes in a mix of houses and flats.)
It was recognised that there would be a need for some flexibility in the plans for sites 6 & 7 to ensure viability in an uncertain and ever-changing economic and trading climate, but no consideration of light industrial use was proposed; until now.
SHRA’s current thinking on question 14 and 15 is;
1. We would prefer that Site 6 remain as offices, but if this is not agreed then the council should consider a mixed arrangement – offices and light industry or, since they and East Sussex County Council have a 999 year lease on the land, they should use it to provide leisure facilities such as playing fields.
2. Site 7a is unsuitable for light industry as it lies between the health centre and the new public open space, and along Pacific Drive is opposite residential properties.
On Site 7a, the council are asking that if residents don’t want light industry or further housing there, and that there is little demand for office space, how should Site 7a be developed to provide employment opportunities? What do you want to see on Site 7a? An hotel or a care home have been suggested. Or would additional housing be more acceptable than light industry? Let the council have your ideas for the site.
Whatever is agreed for Sites 6 and 7a, we believe that it should be a condition that the appropriate infrastructure be put in place. In our view this includes additional parking on site and a separate access to Pevensey Bay Road. We do not accept the Council’s view that such a change would have a minimal effect on transport. Any change of use to light industry without consideration of consequences for parking and logistics traffic would be entirely unsuitable.
Eastbourne’s Direction of Travel: Issues & Options for the Eastbourne Local Plan is an important document that is worth spending a little time on, and well worth responding to. There is much else in the Eastbourne Plan that will be of interest to Sovereign Harbour residents, including a strategy on out-of-town retail sites that may have some consequences for the Sovereign Harbour Retail Park (see page 44 of The Plan). It also proposes policies on flood defences, public transport, the environment and global warming that will have serious implications for the future. Let the council have your views on the future of our town. Any views are strengthened by the number of similar responses received.
The full Issues & Options document can be viewed or downloaded from the EBC Local Plan website: http://planningpolicyconsult.lewes-eastbourne.gov.uk/
SHRA has extracted all the questions and options as a separate document that you may wish to use as an aid when responding. Click this link to download the full list of questions and options from the SHRA website .
How to respond
Responses can be submitted in writing or by completing an on-line questionnaire found on the EBC Local Plan website (see above). For responding on a single issue you can download and use this EBC Word document The closing date for making comments is Friday 24 January 2020.